Skip to main content


Quick, less edited video to talk about the #Mozilla and #Firefox issue with their recent terms of use, and lackluster explanations:

youtube.com/watch?v=Rc96ISKh2O…

in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

@blackbeard I'm really hoping I'm the future it could be ladybird. They just did their montly update video a couple days ago and they keep chipping away at getting to a usable state.

The rate of their progress is pretty cool. Not there yet, but I'm really Hopeful.

in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

but these forks can't exist without Mozilla. They change four settings and that's it, they are not able to support browser development.

I don't think Firefox is good, but are the alternatives better? And do they promise not to sell data?

I doubt that Servo can save us.

I think Firefox is the least bad of all the bad browsers

in reply to Distante

@Distante The least bad doesn’t mean we give them a pass :) In the meantime, the forks don’t have all these BS terms and history of shady stuff that we all half brush away. I’ll reassess when things change again!
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

@blackbeard if Firefox falls, all of the forks will as well, none of them has the skills or the resources to stay alive in any meaningful way
in reply to Marsup

@marsup @blackbeard Yep, that’s pretty disheartening. Right now, I want so support the engine, but not the company, if that makes sense?
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

How to depend on Mozilla to keep on doing good work on Firefox without helping pushing the world more towards Chrome is my question.

I can tell the common people to use Firefox, as it works and generally is still better than the Chrome monoculture (and from a privacy point) but any name they don't instantly recognise just gets discarded.

in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

If Mozilla really pivots into harvesting user data to sell to AI companies for profit then it's time to switch but I'll keep using it for the time being and see how it works out.

Speaking of email clients, I've been using Evolution for what seems like forever now. Tried Thunderbird a couple of times but always keep coming back.

in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

while u hv mentioned that the data is likely only 2 hv come fm the browser, watt would happen if they r harvesting info fm 1s email? Is there any way we can export thunderbird private folders to say evolution or some other email client?
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

I have an hard time ditching mozilla, as I am a serious fan of the excellent email client Thunderbird...
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

Aren't we overreacting a bit?
Firefox has been on a declining adoption curve for years, let's try not to discourage even more people from using it. Unless there's a very valid, proven reason. Not just suspicion.
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

as said Churchill : Firefox is the worst browser, except all the others.
There are no real better alternatives I am afraid 🤷‍♂️ (and the forks are just a short time solution)
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

There two "nice" outcome of all this :
* mozilla is going back to sanity
* a fork is being create with most of the engineers currently working on Firefox move too

The current "forks" alternative is not a real one. They just apply some small patches on top of Firefox, but not the "real" work of maintaining/evolving the core of the browser

in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

That was a useful, if depressing video. I've been using Firefox off and on for more than twenty years so I've got a lot of inertia to overcome!

Having said that, that lit a fire under me to actually try LibreWolf! First impressions after five minutes - it's actually very similar to how I have Firefox set up. It comes with uBlock Origin pre-installed which gets a big thumbs up from me.

in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

Any good alternative for Firefox? I using KeepassXC addon and Ublock Origin for sufing on net.
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

@Nick @ The Linux Experiment @LibreWolf @Ivan Jurišić I used Floorp, but had some kind of problem, don't remember what so I changed a couple Flatpak settings to give it more system access, and it crashed, effectively wiping out my user account, all my notes and settings.
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

It might seem obvious, but anyone who offers web browser software, their *browser* has access to the data fetched by requests and anything typed into a form, included files attached to POST data for upload, any bookmarks you create, and the history.

Not surprised if after all the fuss it turns out Mozilla legal decided (for some reason) they needed explicitly state this, and other browser makers merely assume you implicitly accept it when you install or update a browser.

in reply to Paul L

@prlzx I’d be surprised if that was the only reason. Firefox didn’t need that since its inception, and right when they announce a pivot towards AI, they’d suddenly needs terms of use?
Way too close to be a coincidence, IMO
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

I would rather wait to see what else changes before jumping to conclusions that require assuming bad faith and saying that Mozilla must be as bad as any other until proven otherwise.

Mozilla *could* show via notification/changelog on each browser update if the terms or privacy policy of Firefox changes, statements that they won't are also opinion rather than known fact.

Users still choose when/if to update browser package so musing about a "kill-switch" is also pure speculation.

This entry was edited (3 months ago)
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

You surely do accept that every browser in existence needs to access the data used to display web pages (they are downloaded and the DOM built and rendered locally).

They never had published terms before but the browser is doing the same things right now to function that they didn't legally spell out before.

Legal are famously bad at writing in plain language esp when describing technology functions unless skilled in both areas or in a joint team - Mozilla aren't alone in that.

in reply to Paul L

@prlzx Of course a browser needs the data to build the DOM. They don’t need user data though, they don’t need to grant Mozilla a license to use that data. They also don’t need to remove all mentions of not selling data from their website. They also don’t need to focus on AI, add extensions into people’s webbrowsers, have the capacity to change terms without notifying users, or to add ad tech in the browser without notice. Mozilla has exceeded the goodwill I had for them.
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

I just think there's an inherent contradiction between assuming that Mozilla are *secretly* planning to do bad things while making it public by publishing terms of use with constraints defined by the privacy policy.

If they were really trying to be secretive about it as you and others have said they could simply not publish any terms for implicit use at all.

I'm disappointed at how many other people have jumped on the same bandwagon attacking a FOSS product without nuance.

in reply to Paul L

@Paul L @Nick @ The Linux Experiment It doesn't help that Firefox has not exactly been making the wisest decisions for a while, nothing on the scale of Google's outright hostility to user privacy, but enough so that there's prolly a fair amount of distrust at this point.
in reply to 🌴 Seph 💭 👾

@vextaur
I mean you could say none of them should be just trusted on their word.

I wonder for people switching to other browsers and email clients whether they'll do an even-handed amount of prior investigation and reviewing company history or will they jump to whatever next thing some popular channels get excited about,

At least until the next controversy and then rinse and repeat.

Surely it's better for cool heads just to pause updates (apt-mark hold) and reflect on choices.

in reply to Paul L

@Paul L @Nick @ The Linux Experiment True, but like I noted, Firefox hasn't helped itself, they've been getting money from Google to make it the default search engine, and from what I understand, being resistant to forking the browser for example, adding AI. Nothing terrible, just the kind of things that make people suspicious of them
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

Btw How may channels have actually spoken with a contact at Mozilla to invite them to discuss this in an interview

before just reporting that intermingles facts, opinions, speculation and historical mistakes with equal gravity

and then telling others to stop using any/all of their products?

This entry was edited (3 months ago)
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

Thank you, this is pretty much exactly how I feel too; I'm very grateful for Mozilla's historical contributions, but they keep being sus lately and this was finally the last straw. And I also settled on Floorp as a smooth short-term replacement. :)

In the long term, Servo or Ladybird or something else is likely the way to go, but those are still at least a year away...

A video on the various alt browsers would be definitely interesting!

in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

And use what? All the hundred Chrome forks? Or several Firefox forks that cannot exist on their own without Firefox and Mozilla? Firefox and Mozilla are a lesser evil. It's not ideal, but I'd rather use tweaked Firefox than any Chrome fork or all the flawed Firefox forks. That's just the reality.

I personally can't wait for Ladybird. A clean slate with no corporate background.

in reply to RejZoR

@rejzor I’ll use a Firefox fork, better they basically have 0 drawbacks compared to Firefox and are at least not subject to Mozilla’s BS, but yeah, it’s a bad situation.
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

I don't think you have to worry about @thunderbird though, Mozilla doesn't seem to care about it at all, they tried to kill it, then get rid of it, eventually just turned it into subsidiary and gave free pass. Thunderbird doesn't even want to use Mozilla account for their sync.
I remember your previous video on Firefox alternatives and the conclusion was "nothing better tbh" and I believe that the only thing that changed since is Mozilla being even worse.
in reply to PondAI

@ponda
You are right, thunderbird says this:

"Thunderbird operates in a separate, for-profit subsidiary of the Mozilla Foundation. This structure gives us the flexibility to offer optional paid services to sustain Thunderbird’s development far into the future."

@thelinuxEXP @thunderbird

in reply to _marco_

@_marco_ @ponda We also wanted to additionally clarify that we won't be adopting the Firefox Terms of Use for Thunderbird, either on desktop or on mobile.
in reply to Thunderbird: Free Your Inbox

@thunderbird @_marco_ @ponda Heared that at Firefox and look what happened ... the trust in Mozilla is gone and Mozilla will have to get up and rebuild this trust in years. Maybe (!) it will regain the trust, but not with this kind of actions.
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

so following the law in mozilla's case (they need that in the states) is bad, but taking money from neonazi supporter is OK? talk about double standards...
yes, the wording was shit, but they explained (backtracked) it.
we still haven't heard YOUR solution to financial woes of mozilla.
in reply to lecroix74

What the hell is the relationship between what they did and taking money from neonazi supporters? What are you even talking about with this?

I also think you misunderstand: I don’t have to prove solutions. My ability to criticize doesn’t require me to have solutions either.

As per walking it back,’it doesn’t make things ok. What wait a week to say which law causes this? Why lot start with that? Why not consult the community? Same mistakes, for the past 10 years…

This entry was edited (3 months ago)
in reply to Andrij Glyko :ua_tryzub:

@nitrogenez @lecroix74 Well, there are some very real neonazis in power in a lot of places right now, in one of the biggest countries on earth even, so that’s not unwarranted. But in this context, I have no idea what they’re talking about.
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

I also think you misunderstand: I don’t have to prove solutions. My ability to criticize doesn’t require me to have solutions either.


THIS.

in reply to R.L. Dane :Debian: :OpenBSD: 🍵 :MiraLovesYou:

@rl_dane @lecroix74 This is an argument I hear so often: « oh well that’s unproductive, what are YOU offering to do? ».

It’s not my job to offer a solution. It’s not my role. I have every right to find something unacceptable without having a solution to offer to fix the issue 😂

in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

Looking forward to your next video on the subject.

As soneone who's used Mozilla for 25 years, it's tragic to me that we're finally at the point where we have to cut our losses and tell them to get lost.

in reply to R.L. Dane :Debian: :OpenBSD: 🍵 :MiraLovesYou:

@rl_dane @lecroix74 Yeah. It could just be the usual miscommunication, but right now, they still have the rights to all the data you input. They’re one privacy policy change away from being able to do whatever they want.

I moved to Firefox as soon as I was made aware of its existence, instead of IE 6. I toughed it out for my entire computing life, as Mozilla blundered its way into irrelevance, but that’s just not acceptable anymore.

in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

the problem being that all other browsers use blink/webkit. It will spell the end of standards of the web and leave the rest of the control to google.
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

I really want #Mozilla to become financially independent from Google. I want a browser manufacturer who believes in the optimistic vision of the internet, which we had before unsocial media.

But if they sacrifice this vision, there is nothing which keeps me at #Firefox.

Anyway, as Linux users, we should also not forget, that the Terms of Usage don't apply to us. We have no business with Mozilla. Our Firefox is provided by Fedora, Ubuntu etc. We never ever agreed to the TOS.

in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

@louisderrac it is probably important to add that this change only affects Mozilla's binaries, so any Mozilla built from source such as this in Linux distros is not submitted to this new assertion
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

You keep saying this but what is the option if you want a browser that looks and works like (past versions of) Firefox and you don't want to have problems accessing sites, and you want to keep using all your Firefox extensions? Don't say LibreWolf because a lot of sites won't work with it (due in part to their overly aggressive privacy measures, that maybe can be disabled but only if you know how). As far as I can tell, every alternative people are suggesting has some drawback - some are major and some just really annoying.

But also, if the issue is Firefox grabbing data of some kind and selling it, isn't there some way to prevent that data from being transmitted to Mozilla, perhaps using something like PiHole or uBlock Origin? All the techie types think just switching browsers is a solution but for many users that's a whole lot easier said than done, and none of the alternatives seem really great.

in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

You present a few alternatives (forks of Firefox) for the desktop, but is there anything to replace Firefox on mobile devices? Would any of these alternatives offer a synchronization of bookmarks and history between devices?
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment

I'd love to see you try Asahi Linix in 2025, I know that you already did a video on that.
This entry was edited (3 months ago)