Quick, less edited video to talk about the #Mozilla and #Firefox issue with their recent terms of use, and lackluster explanations:
youtube.com/watch?v=Rc96ISKh2O…
- YouTube
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.www.youtube.com
blackbeard 🇪🇺
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •Nick @ The Linux Experiment
in reply to blackbeard 🇪🇺 • • •Cris
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •@blackbeard I'm really hoping I'm the future it could be ladybird. They just did their montly update video a couple days ago and they keep chipping away at getting to a usable state.
The rate of their progress is pretty cool. Not there yet, but I'm really Hopeful.
Distante
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •but these forks can't exist without Mozilla. They change four settings and that's it, they are not able to support browser development.
I don't think Firefox is good, but are the alternatives better? And do they promise not to sell data?
I doubt that Servo can save us.
I think Firefox is the least bad of all the bad browsers
Nick @ The Linux Experiment
in reply to Distante • • •Marsup
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •Nick @ The Linux Experiment
in reply to Marsup • • •alihan_banan
in reply to blackbeard 🇪🇺 • • •zaart
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •Nickolas Grigoriadis
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •How to depend on Mozilla to keep on doing good work on Firefox without helping pushing the world more towards Chrome is my question.
I can tell the common people to use Firefox, as it works and generally is still better than the Chrome monoculture (and from a privacy point) but any name they don't instantly recognise just gets discarded.
sebulon
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •If Mozilla really pivots into harvesting user data to sell to AI companies for profit then it's time to switch but I'll keep using it for the time being and see how it works out.
Speaking of email clients, I've been using Evolution for what seems like forever now. Tried Thunderbird a couple of times but always keep coming back.
ALF
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •alexraffa :unverified:
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •Konrad
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •Firefox has been on a declining adoption curve for years, let's try not to discourage even more people from using it. Unless there's a very valid, proven reason. Not just suspicion.
Martin 🧀
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •There are no real better alternatives I am afraid 🤷♂️ (and the forks are just a short time solution)
FoxyBroxy880
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •🌴 Seph 💭 👾
in reply to FoxyBroxy880 • •FoxyBroxy880 likes this.
FoxyBroxy880
in reply to 🌴 Seph 💭 👾 • • •Vincent Maurin
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •There two "nice" outcome of all this :
* mozilla is going back to sanity
* a fork is being create with most of the engineers currently working on Firefox move too
The current "forks" alternative is not a real one. They just apply some small patches on top of Firefox, but not the "real" work of maintaining/evolving the core of the browser
Ugh! What a Day!
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •That was a useful, if depressing video. I've been using Firefox off and on for more than twenty years so I've got a lot of inertia to overcome!
Having said that, that lit a fire under me to actually try LibreWolf! First impressions after five minutes - it's actually very similar to how I have Firefox set up. It comes with uBlock Origin pre-installed which gets a big thumbs up from me.
Puppy Cuir
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •Ivan Jurišić
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •🌴 Seph 💭 👾
in reply to Ivan Jurišić • — (STL, MO, US, Earth) •like this
Nick @ The Linux Experiment and R like this.
Nick @ The Linux Experiment
in reply to 🌴 Seph 💭 👾 • • •🌴 Seph 💭 👾
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • •Paul L
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •It might seem obvious, but anyone who offers web browser software, their *browser* has access to the data fetched by requests and anything typed into a form, included files attached to POST data for upload, any bookmarks you create, and the history.
Not surprised if after all the fuss it turns out Mozilla legal decided (for some reason) they needed explicitly state this, and other browser makers merely assume you implicitly accept it when you install or update a browser.
Nick @ The Linux Experiment
in reply to Paul L • • •Way too close to be a coincidence, IMO
Paul L
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •I would rather wait to see what else changes before jumping to conclusions that require assuming bad faith and saying that Mozilla must be as bad as any other until proven otherwise.
Mozilla *could* show via notification/changelog on each browser update if the terms or privacy policy of Firefox changes, statements that they won't are also opinion rather than known fact.
Users still choose when/if to update browser package so musing about a "kill-switch" is also pure speculation.
Paul L
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •You surely do accept that every browser in existence needs to access the data used to display web pages (they are downloaded and the DOM built and rendered locally).
They never had published terms before but the browser is doing the same things right now to function that they didn't legally spell out before.
Legal are famously bad at writing in plain language esp when describing technology functions unless skilled in both areas or in a joint team - Mozilla aren't alone in that.
Nick @ The Linux Experiment
in reply to Paul L • • •Paul L
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •I just think there's an inherent contradiction between assuming that Mozilla are *secretly* planning to do bad things while making it public by publishing terms of use with constraints defined by the privacy policy.
If they were really trying to be secretive about it as you and others have said they could simply not publish any terms for implicit use at all.
I'm disappointed at how many other people have jumped on the same bandwagon attacking a FOSS product without nuance.
🌴 Seph 💭 👾
in reply to Paul L • •R likes this.
Paul L
in reply to 🌴 Seph 💭 👾 • • •@vextaur
I mean you could say none of them should be just trusted on their word.
I wonder for people switching to other browsers and email clients whether they'll do an even-handed amount of prior investigation and reviewing company history or will they jump to whatever next thing some popular channels get excited about,
At least until the next controversy and then rinse and repeat.
Surely it's better for cool heads just to pause updates (apt-mark hold) and reflect on choices.
🌴 Seph 💭 👾 likes this.
🌴 Seph 💭 👾
in reply to Paul L • •Paul L
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •Btw How may channels have actually spoken with a contact at Mozilla to invite them to discuss this in an interview
before just reporting that intermingles facts, opinions, speculation and historical mistakes with equal gravity
and then telling others to stop using any/all of their products?
Kirinn B.
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •Thank you, this is pretty much exactly how I feel too; I'm very grateful for Mozilla's historical contributions, but they keep being sus lately and this was finally the last straw. And I also settled on Floorp as a smooth short-term replacement. :)
In the long term, Servo or Ladybird or something else is likely the way to go, but those are still at least a year away...
A video on the various alt browsers would be definitely interesting!
RejZoR
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •And use what? All the hundred Chrome forks? Or several Firefox forks that cannot exist on their own without Firefox and Mozilla? Firefox and Mozilla are a lesser evil. It's not ideal, but I'd rather use tweaked Firefox than any Chrome fork or all the flawed Firefox forks. That's just the reality.
I personally can't wait for Ladybird. A clean slate with no corporate background.
Nick @ The Linux Experiment
in reply to RejZoR • • •PondAI
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •I remember your previous video on Firefox alternatives and the conclusion was "nothing better tbh" and I believe that the only thing that changed since is Mozilla being even worse.
_marco_
in reply to PondAI • • •@ponda
You are right, thunderbird says this:
"Thunderbird operates in a separate, for-profit subsidiary of the Mozilla Foundation. This structure gives us the flexibility to offer optional paid services to sustain Thunderbird’s development far into the future."
@thelinuxEXP @thunderbird
Thunderbird: Free Your Inbox
in reply to _marco_ • • •Nick @ The Linux Experiment reshared this.
Sascha Presnac 🙄🤦♂️
in reply to Thunderbird: Free Your Inbox • • •hapx
in reply to Thunderbird: Free Your Inbox • • •lecroix74
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •yes, the wording was shit, but they explained (backtracked) it.
we still haven't heard YOUR solution to financial woes of mozilla.
Nick @ The Linux Experiment
in reply to lecroix74 • • •What the hell is the relationship between what they did and taking money from neonazi supporters? What are you even talking about with this?
I also think you misunderstand: I don’t have to prove solutions. My ability to criticize doesn’t require me to have solutions either.
As per walking it back,’it doesn’t make things ok. What wait a week to say which law causes this? Why lot start with that? Why not consult the community? Same mistakes, for the past 10 years…
Andrij Glyko :ua_tryzub:
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •Nick @ The Linux Experiment
in reply to Andrij Glyko :ua_tryzub: • • •R.L. Dane :Debian: :OpenBSD: 🍵 :MiraLovesYou:
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •THIS.
Nick @ The Linux Experiment
in reply to R.L. Dane :Debian: :OpenBSD: 🍵 :MiraLovesYou: • • •@rl_dane @lecroix74 This is an argument I hear so often: « oh well that’s unproductive, what are YOU offering to do? ».
It’s not my job to offer a solution. It’s not my role. I have every right to find something unacceptable without having a solution to offer to fix the issue 😂
Vik-Thor / Lirleni likes this.
R.L. Dane :Debian: :OpenBSD: 🍵 :MiraLovesYou:
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •Looking forward to your next video on the subject.
As soneone who's used Mozilla for 25 years, it's tragic to me that we're finally at the point where we have to cut our losses and tell them to get lost.
Nick @ The Linux Experiment
in reply to R.L. Dane :Debian: :OpenBSD: 🍵 :MiraLovesYou: • • •@rl_dane @lecroix74 Yeah. It could just be the usual miscommunication, but right now, they still have the rights to all the data you input. They’re one privacy policy change away from being able to do whatever they want.
I moved to Firefox as soon as I was made aware of its existence, instead of IE 6. I toughed it out for my entire computing life, as Mozilla blundered its way into irrelevance, but that’s just not acceptable anymore.
Vik-Thor / Lirleni
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • •@Nick @ The Linux Experiment @R.L. Dane :Debian: :OpenBSD: 🍵 @lecroix74
Criticizing, pointing out issues, can make people þink, and realize þat þere are oþer ways of doing þings
Andreas :tux:
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •Felix
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •I really want #Mozilla to become financially independent from Google. I want a browser manufacturer who believes in the optimistic vision of the internet, which we had before unsocial media.
But if they sacrifice this vision, there is nothing which keeps me at #Firefox.
Anyway, as Linux users, we should also not forget, that the Terms of Usage don't apply to us. We have no business with Mozilla. Our Firefox is provided by Fedora, Ubuntu etc. We never ever agreed to the TOS.
Hypra
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •maple
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •You keep saying this but what is the option if you want a browser that looks and works like (past versions of) Firefox and you don't want to have problems accessing sites, and you want to keep using all your Firefox extensions? Don't say LibreWolf because a lot of sites won't work with it (due in part to their overly aggressive privacy measures, that maybe can be disabled but only if you know how). As far as I can tell, every alternative people are suggesting has some drawback - some are major and some just really annoying.
But also, if the issue is Firefox grabbing data of some kind and selling it, isn't there some way to prevent that data from being transmitted to Mozilla, perhaps using something like PiHole or uBlock Origin? All the techie types think just switching browsers is a solution but for many users that's a whole lot easier said than done, and none of the alternatives seem really great.
AurelDel
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •obnomus
in reply to Nick @ The Linux Experiment • • •