-----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY-----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-----END PUBLIC KEY-----
2025-10-10T14:30:09+00:00
- About:
- π§ CAUTION π§
An old coffee addicted β, pizza π loving electric car piloting, boxen wrangling aegosexual stumbling πΆaround STL and the web π. MLP fandom fan, MLP proofreader, often a bat pony (MLP), sometimes furry πΎ, just as often a centaur, sometimes an umamimi, sometimes an African Wild Dog. π€―
#fedi22
- Uid
-
1a041b09-1267-2e68-89be-3e3380232354
- Nickname
-
vextaur
- Full_name
-
π΄ Seph π πΎ
- Searchable
-
true
- First_name
-
π΄
- Family_name
-
Seph π πΎ
- Url
-
https://blog.taursnd.haus/
- Photo
-
- Photo_medium
-
- Photo_small
-
Altbot
in reply to π΄ Seph π πΎ • • •The image features a black background with white text, presenting a critical commentary on the concept of rights in a political context. The text is structured in a series of statements, each emphasizing the idea that rights are not secure under the current system. The first statement highlights the vulnerability of rights to a "Bad President" and the dependency on a "Good President" to restore them, suggesting that such rights are not truly inalienable. The second statement argues that if politicians can take or distribute rights, they are not "inalienable" and are instead "conditional privileges." The third statement asserts that the current system grants rights based on the whims of those in power, rather than as inherent rights. The final statement calls for a system where no one has the power to take away rights, implying a need for a more robust protection of individual liberties.
Provided by @altbot, generated privately and locally using Ovis2-8B
π± Energy used: 0.190 Wh