Skip to main content

friendica (DFRN) - Link to source

DHS says REAL ID is too unreliable to confirm U.S. citizenship

Honestly I might not be against a central database considering my experience with the current system, where my AZ driver's license got suspended because my non-existent NJ driver's license got suspended. How does that work? The states all share data about licenses, but there's no oversight on the accuracy, got a problem, go deal with the agency that screwed up. At least with a central database, you only have one agency to deal with, and the local branch can fix it without you having to travel across the country to sort things out.


reason.com/2025/12/31/dhs-says…

#uspol


DHS says REAL ID is too unreliable to confirm U.S. citizenship

Philip Lavoie, an acting assistant special agent, stated that, "REAL ID can be unreliable to confirm U.S. citizenship."
C.J. Ciaramella (Reason Magazine)
#uspol

Bruce Heerssen reshared this.

in reply to 🌴 Seph 💭 👾

Bruce Heerssen
mastodon - Link to source
Bruce Heerssen
• •
So what, then, would DHS consider to be reliable proof that one is a citizen? Is there anything at all?
in reply to Bruce Heerssen

🌴 Seph 💭 👾
friendica (DFRN) - Link to source
🌴 Seph 💭 👾
•
@Bruce Heerssen Then depends on your skin colour and what you have on you, its whatever document you don't have on you, whether such a document exists or not.
@Bruce Heerssen
in reply to 🌴 Seph 💭 👾

Bruce Heerssen
mastodon - Link to source
Bruce Heerssen
• •
True. I just want someone to press DHS about it. Make them answer that question.
in reply to 🌴 Seph 💭 👾

Mark Wollschlager
diaspora - Link to source
Mark Wollschlager
• •
Well, it was up to the state to follow the national requirements. The documents that I was required to provide are the basic citizenship documents. Birth certificate, passport, proof of residence. That should be the minimum in all states. There is no need for a "national database" of citizens other than the ones that already exist, IRS, SS for instance.
⇧