26 Then God said, βLet us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.β
In that sense, even the "Promised Land" that was allotted to the Twelve Tribes of Israel could be perceived as colonialismβbecause the area was already inhabited by humans (and animals...)
The word dominion is rooted in the idea of a house or household. Hence, in biblical context it suggests learning to rightly administer the "household" of Earth.
The Lakotas of North America describe this concept as "kinship."
"Kinship with all creatures of the earth, sky and water was a real and active principle. In the animal and bird world there existed a brotherly feeling that kept the Lakota safe among them. And so close did some of the Lakotas come to their feathered and furred friends that in true brotherhood they spoke a common tongue." ~ Luther Standing Bear
even the βPromised Landβ that was allotted to the Twelve Tribes of Israel could be perceived as colonialismβbecause the area was already inhabited by humans (and animalsβ¦)
The real irony there in that specific case is that the Old Testament is (as is often the case) wrong. Archaeological evidence proves that the Israelites were actually decedents of the original Canaanites, they are the indigenous population.
You have to keep in mind that the Old Testament is a work of fiction. Work in archaeology and genetics has proven that almost nothing written in the books is historically accurate. For instance the Israelites were never slaves in Egypt, they were slaves in Babylon.
Thanks for sharing the link regarding Jews and Arabs being genetically related to Canaanites.
Interestingly, I discovered another article at the site that distinguishes Ashkenazi Jews (Europeans) from biblical Jews (Canaanites.)
β§β§β§
You have to keep in mind that the Old Testament is a work of fiction. Work in archaeology and genetics has proven that almost nothing written in the books is historically accurate. For instance the Israelites were never slaves in Egypt, they were slaves in Babylon.
Do you think that's why Revelation specifically references _"Babylon"_ as the world system that would have dominion over Earth and enslave her people?
A recent study on mitochondrial DNA revealed that the female line of Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry closely resembles that of Southern and Western Europe, rather than
I don't think much in Revelation to John is coherent. If you read it out loud it sounds like heavy metal lyrics. Scholarship shows it is actually very typical of 1st century apocalyptic writing which was very popular then. Writers at the time could sell these as quickly as they could write them. This one is apocrypha, but was included in the New Testament because it mentions Jesus, but it probably post-dates the gospels.
Adam Hunt
in reply to ππππππ π³οΈββ§οΈπ¦ • • •It is straight from the Old Testament
Braye S.
in reply to ππππππ π³οΈββ§οΈπ¦ • • •@Adam Hunt: "Dominion" connotes _righteous administration_...
Tess likes this.
Adam Hunt
in reply to ππππππ π³οΈββ§οΈπ¦ • • •Yes it does. It is al colonialism though. A very old human tradition.
Braye S.
in reply to ππππππ π³οΈββ§οΈπ¦ • • •@Adam Hunt: I see what you mean.
In that sense, even the "Promised Land" that was allotted to the Twelve Tribes of Israel could be perceived as colonialismβbecause the area was already inhabited by humans (and animals...)
The word dominion is rooted in the idea of a house or household. Hence, in biblical context it suggests learning to rightly administer the "household" of Earth.
The Lakotas of North America describe this concept as "kinship."
Tess likes this.
Adam Hunt
in reply to ππππππ π³οΈββ§οΈπ¦ • • •The real irony there in that specific case is that the Old Testament is (as is often the case) wrong. Archaeological evidence proves that the Israelites were actually decedents of the original Canaanites, they are the indigenous population.
Braye S.
in reply to ππππππ π³οΈββ§οΈπ¦ • • •@Adam Hunt: Abraham dwelled in Canaan but was from Ur.
Do you know if the archaeological evidence has linked the Canaanites (Israelites) to inhabitants of Ur?
Adam Hunt
in reply to ππππππ π³οΈββ§οΈπ¦ • • •You have to keep in mind that the Old Testament is a work of fiction. Work in archaeology and genetics has proven that almost nothing written in the books is historically accurate. For instance the Israelites were never slaves in Egypt, they were slaves in Babylon.
Jews and Arabs Descended from Canaanites - Biblical Archaeology Society
Jonathan Laden (Biblical Archaeology Society)Braye S.
in reply to ππππππ π³οΈββ§οΈπ¦ • • •Thanks for sharing the link regarding Jews and Arabs being genetically related to Canaanites.
Interestingly, I discovered another article at the site that distinguishes Ashkenazi Jews (Europeans) from biblical Jews (Canaanites.)
β§β§β§
Do you think that's why Revelation specifically references _"Babylon"_ as the world system that would have dominion over Earth and enslave her people?
Ashkenazi Jewish Ancestry Confirmed European by mtDNA Tests - Biblical Archaeology Society
Noah Wiener (Biblical Archaeology Society)Tess likes this.
Adam Hunt
in reply to ππππππ π³οΈββ§οΈπ¦ • • •