Skip to main content


I'm glad to add Firefox to the list of apps I have to constantly check to make sure they haven't turned back on all the anti-features I disabled.

#firefox #mozilla #AI #GenAI #GenerativeAI #SmartIsSurveillance #tech #dev #web

in reply to Anthony

Based on the answers to this StackOverflow question and this blog post, here are the 16 (!!!) AI-related settings in new versions of Firefox that you'll want to disable/set to false, and that might be turned back on with each update:

- browser.aiwindow.enabled
- browser.ml.chat.enabled
- browser.ml.chat.menu
- browser.ml.chat.page.footerBadge
- browser.ml.chat.page.menuBadge
- browser.ml.chat.page
- browser.ml.chat.shortcuts
- browser.ml.chat.sidebar
- browser.ml.enable
- browser.ml.linkPreview.enabled
- browser.ml.pageAssist.enabled
- browser.ml.smartAssist.enabled
- browser.tabs.groups.smart.enabled
- browser.tabs.groups.smart.userEnabled
- extensions.ml.enabled
- sidebar.notification.badge.aichat

Enter "about:config" in the browser bar and then search for each of these and disable them, turn them off, or set them to false as appropriate.

Depending on which version of Firefox you have you may not have all these configuration options.

Check your smartphone browsers too!

#firefox #mozilla #AI #GenAI #GenerativeAI #SmartIsSurveillance #tech #dev #web #NoAI #AICruft #antifeatures

This entry was edited (4 weeks ago)

paulrickards reshared this.

in reply to Anthony

as the blog post says, though - confirmed by a Mozilla engineer's comment I saw once - if you want no LLM features at all you only need browser.ml.enable! This gives the impression you need to disable all of these and be on the lookout for more, which is misleading.
This entry was edited (3 weeks ago)
in reply to Amy

also, what gave you the impression they might be turned back on automatically? That's not how Firefox config is supposed to work.
in reply to Amy

I've lost the link to the post that stated this occurred to them, but I've seen the possibility mentioned. I don't believe you are correct that the config is not supposed to work this way; whether the configs are modified after a Firefox upgrade is at Mozilla's discretion, and if new configuration settings are added they'll choose a default. For their ML and AI features their chosen default has been "true", meaning these are opt-out features. I consider software a bad actor when it opts me into a clearly-problematic new feature without even notifying me that it's done so. Consent matters etc.
This entry was edited (3 weeks ago)
in reply to Anthony

ye-es, it technically can be. I just wouldn't expect them to do that, and have never seen them do that; what would be the benefit to them? But yes.
in reply to Amy

What would be the benefit to them, a large foundation half-funded by Google, to press AI features into their products against the will of many of their users, the way so many other large tech and tech-adjacent organizations have been doing for several years? I'll leave that one as an exercise for the reader.
in reply to Anthony

I don't know. The benefit to Google is they collect data that way; they are known to do that. Their (all-online) offerings may become subscription services in the future, once they've already got everyone hooked. But Mozilla's offerings (excluding the sidebar integration, which requires clicking a button anyway) run on-device. Quite different!
in reply to Amy

Default opt-in is a dark pattern, and signals an untrustworthy organization in my personal opinion. Something's gone off the rails when software starts including known-controversial features as default opt-in. That's my starting point for all this.

Incorporating Perplexity AI search, as Firefox is also doing, is not on-device. Granted that's different from the features affected by these config options. But who's to say whether future ML and AI features they add will continue to be on device. I for one will be watching them very closely, and I see now downside to doing so.

in reply to Amy

Or, what might lead a large complex piece of software, developed over a long period of time by a large number of engineers, to have diverging namespaces for configuration options that could in theory be merged? I'll leave that one as an exercise for the reader also.
in reply to Amy

Please don't refer to my post as misleading without first asking where I'm coming from. That's needlessly accusatory, and helps no one.

browser.ml.enable presumably does not clobber all the LLM/AI features. There are "smartAssist", "aiWindow" and "aichat" features that may or may not be affected by that setting, since they are in different namespaces. Furthermore, if you'd read the StackOverflow page and the comments, you'd have seen that some of these features are newly-added in the latest release of Firefox. Hence the admonition to be on the lookout for new ones.

in reply to Anthony

I should have perhaps qualified with "to the best of my knowledge", sorry. I didn't mean it was misleading intentionally at all. I'm just worried this will give people needless anxiety, scouring about:config every Firefox update.

I believe it does though - although yes, technically we cannot be 100% sure.

in reply to Amy

I do not, and I do not see how it is in any way misleading to say so.
in reply to Anthony

it suggests that you need to turn them all off, that's all.

Based on … and this blog post


The blog post says you can turn them all off with browser.ml.enable.

in reply to Amy

Thanks for your feedback. I am muting this thread now because it's reached the absurdum part of the ad absurdum cycle. Have a good one.
in reply to Amy

I'm inclined not to trust the Reddit post of an employee of the organization doing the not-nice thing to an otherwise-nice browser, thanks, especially when it contradicts the reported experience of users of the otherwise-nice browser. It causes near-0 harm to toggle all of those configuration settings and spare oneself the risk.
This entry was edited (3 weeks ago)
in reply to Anthony

I for one trust the employees the most! What would be the motivation of doing otherwise? I've seen the same stated multiple times. It's your choice whether to think the same, but I would add a note that a single flag is supposed to do all the work now and in the future, reducing anxiety.
in reply to Amy

What would be the motivation for an employee of a large organization to enthusiastically support the mission of the organization they've chosen to work for, and that provides them their livelihood, to the point that they might overlook certain facts that are of importance to people less enthusiastic about their organization's recent behavior? I'll leave that as an exercise for the reader.

Your vigorous assertions that a single flag should turn off all the ML/AI features--including the ones in different namespaces--are unconvincing. Since it is a negligible amount of additional work for me to toggle all of them off/false/what have you, I will continue to do so.

in reply to Anthony

my understanding is that the global switch is enough to disable it, and we treat that as a bug if it doesn't. Also I've been told there will be a switch in the preferences eventually.
This entry was edited (3 weeks ago)
in reply to Julien W.

If you read the comments on my post you'll see several other people have said the same thing, and that I responded with skepticism (which I explained).
in reply to Anthony

you can be skeptical, but what I said is that if this doesn't work it's handled as a bug and you can file it and it will be fixed.
in reply to Anthony

I did, in addition I work at mozilla and I personally know the folks working on AI functionalities.
This entry was edited (3 weeks ago)
in reply to Julien W.

Does setting browser.ml.enable to false override browser.ml.linkPreview.enabled, browser.ml.pageAssist.enabled and browser.ml.smartAssist.enabled? Does it set them to false? If so this behavior is not obvious, and the naming of these options in this way is ripe for confusion and misinterpretation. If these settings are left alone, then they have be checked separately.

Does setting browser.ml.enable to false also set extensions.ml.enabled to false or override? If so, why? That is unexpected and confusing behavior. If not, then these settings have to be checked and changed separately.

Does setting browser.ml.enable to false also set browser.tabs.groups.smart.enabled and browser.tabs.groups.smart.userEnabled to false, or overide them? If so, why the heck? This is unexpected and confusing behavior. If not, then these have to be checked and changed separately.

Does setting browser.ml.enable to false set browser.ml.chat.sidebar to false, or override it? If so, why? If not, this is another setting that has to be checked and changed separately.

What about browser.ml.chat.shortcuts and browser.ml.chat.shortcuts.custom?

Does setting browser.ml.enable to false also set browser.aiwindow.enabled to false, or override it? If so, what the hell? If not, this is another setting that has to be checked and changed separately.

I don't have the numbers in front of me but Firefox used to have maybe 5 settings like this. Now it has 16. How many more are going to be added? 32 more? 100 more? Will they all be controlled, ultimately, by browser.ml.enable, regardless of how they're named? If not, how am I to know when I need to scour through these settings again to see if any new ones have popped up? This feels user hostile if you're a user who does not want AI cruft in your web browser.

How many bug reports do you reckon I should file about the above?

in reply to Anthony

Quite a few of those features can be turned off without needing to go into about:config. Much easier and much safer.
in reply to Paul

I'm not going to poke through a settings panel and hope. I want all these settings permanently off. I don't want the settings to be reverted after upgrade, which some reports suggest is happening. I don't want new configuration options that I'm opted into by default to pop up without my knowing.

Right now watching about:config is the only viable way to satisfy those requirements.

"Much safer"? AI/LLMs are not safe. I'll make safety judgments for myself, thanks. "Much easier"? I'll be the judge of that, thanks.

A strange reply, I have to say--it's unclear what your motivations are for posting this.

in reply to Anthony

Saving you and others from having to poke around in about:config and risking data loss and damaging your own Fx setup was the aim.

The settings screen is much easier to navigate and safer to use for most people and with good reason it does not have the same warning screen as about:config.

in reply to Paul

And you believe I don't know this because.........?

Saving you


Check that savior complex talk please.

in reply to Anthony

I'm intensely curious what percentage of Firefox users are tech-savvy enough to use Firefox in 2025 but excited to use AI? I would think it's less than half.

"You know all of that unethical, privacy-invasive, environmentally damaging, frequently inaccurate technology you refuse to use? Well, have I got good news for you!"

What's next, built in NFTs?

in reply to firebreathingduck

I am curious as well.

Mozilla's new CEO is all-in on AI, though, regardless of what its users want: lwn.net/Articles/1050826/

Third: Firefox will grow from a browser into a broader ecosystem of trusted software. Firefox will remain our anchor. It will evolve into a modern AI browser and support a portfolio of new and trusted software additions.


He says the word "trust" a whole bunch of times yet intends to turn an otherwise nice web browser into a slop-slinging platform. I don't expect this will work out very well for anyone.

in reply to Anthony

Long post

I've now had at least four people, two of whom self-identified as Mozilla employees, claim that the above list of AI features--which were suddenly and rapidly added over the last few releases of Firefox, and were "on" (true) by default--could easily be turned off by flipping one master kill switch. This is not true, but folks keep claiming it or suggesting it anyway.

Here's a post from an official Firefox Mastodon account suggesting such a master kill switch does not exist yet, but will be added in a future release:

mastodon.social/@firefoxwebdev…

That's not as bad as it could be. It's bad they're stuffing AI into a perfectly good web browser for no apparent reason other than vibes or desperation. It's very bad if it's on by default; their dissembling post about it aside, opt-in has a reasonably clear meaning here: if there's a kill switch, then that kill switch should be off by default. But at least there will be a kill switch.

In any case, please stop responding to my post saying there's a master kill switch for Firefox's AI slop features. From the horse's mouth, and from user experience, there is not yet.

Furthermore, when there is a master kill switch, we don't know whether flipping it will maintain previous state of all the features it controls. In other words it's possible they'll have the master kill switch turn on all AI features when the switch is flipped to "on" or "true", rather than leaving them in whatever state you'd set them to previously. Perhaps you decide to turn the kill switch on because there are a handful of features you're comfortable with and you want to try them; will doing so mean that now all the AI features are on? We won't know till it's released and people try this. So, in the meantime, it's still good practice to keep an eye on all these configuration options if you want the AI off.

#AI #GenAI #GenerativeAI #LLMs #web #tech #dev #Firefox #Mozilla #AISlop #NoAI #NoLLMs #NoAIBrowsers


Something that hasn't been made clear: Firefox will have an option to completely disable all AI features.

We've been calling it the AI kill switch internally. I'm sure it'll ship with a less murderous name, but that's how seriously and absolutely we're taking this.


This entry was edited (2 days ago)
in reply to Anthony

Long post

Sensitive content

in reply to P.J. Meisch

Long post

It's a good question, and I have to confess that I did not check as thoroughly as I should have before posting. Here's what I just found:

That account is run by Jake Archibald, who joined Mozilla in August working on Firefox. The kill switch coming in an upcoming release is confirmed here: 9to5linux.com/firefox-will-shi…

as well as by the new Mozilla CEO on reddit here: reddit.com/user/anthony-firefo…

If this is being faked then whoever's doing it sure is going to a lot of trouble.

in reply to Anthony

It's possible to use Firefox's 'enterprise' policy system to hard-set known preferences in a way that sticks. I've resorted to doing it for my setup, with increasingly gritted teeth. Some documentation is at mozilla.github.io/policy-templ…

I learned about it from electric.marf.space/@trysdyn/s…


Reminder that Firefox has a pathway to specifying some settings, including ones not exposed to users any other way, with a config file stored on disk.

They call it enterprise policies but anyone can use it by just putting a file in the location indicated on that site.

You can disable entire features, opt out of Telemetry before your first launch of Firefox on a new install, declare you never want to be part of studies, turn off their ML integration and keep it off, force about:config preferences in a way that can't be "accidentally" reverted, etc.


in reply to Chris Siebenmann

This is great, thank you. A few people have suggested Betterfox and Arkenfox, which if I'm understanding correctly use a custom user.js to harden the browser. Arkenfox has a user-override.js file where you put the settings you want to stick between updates; I imagine Betterfox has something similar but I haven't looked that much into it yet. You could put these AI settings in there. I hesitate to publicly suggest such things till I've had a chance to check them out so I haven't. It's good to see there are options, though.
in reply to Anthony

these solutions all have the problem that mozilla likes to replace those about config settings with settings that are the exact same but are named differently. So either the project you're using, like arkenfox, not only agrees with your choices and uses them as default, but also reliably provides updates to reflect Mozilla's changes, or you'll have to keep track of that and there is no warning whatsoever from Firefox when one of the settings you applied suddenly no longer exists after an update, you'll probably only notice it when Firefox misbehaves.

For example, arkenfox by default deletes all history and closes all tabs when you quit Firefox, so in my override file I changed that back to the Firefox default behaviour, only for mozilla to change the names of those settings and then when I updated arkenfox, it applied its defaults to those new settings and suddenly, the next time I reopened my Firefox, everything was gone. That was real fun. Luckily I had a backup.

in reply to Ellie 🏴🏳️‍⚧️

Eesh, thanks for this info. This possibility is one of the reasons I haven't tried either of those projects.